I haven't heard about that one. Too busy with Trump's exceeding misinformed executive order on the same subject.
But intersex conditions are way more complicated than AIS/CAIS. For example I found a paper on the net about a family that for several generations has had XY *females*. Definitely female because they got pregnant and gave birth!
Lord only know what genetic weirdness on the Y chromosome (or one of the others) allowed *that*.
And then there's the "usual" weirdness X0, XXY, XYY, XYYY and more. Guevodoces.
Dare I ask what "simple" but wrong idea the Brit judges went with?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2025-04-16 06:55 pm (UTC)But intersex conditions are way more complicated than AIS/CAIS. For example I found a paper on the net about a family that for several generations has had XY *females*. Definitely female because they got pregnant and gave birth!
Lord only know what genetic weirdness on the Y chromosome (or one of the others) allowed *that*.
And then there's the "usual" weirdness X0, XXY, XYY, XYYY and more. Guevodoces.
Dare I ask what "simple" but wrong idea the Brit judges went with?