Date: 2010-12-14 06:01 am (UTC)
kengr: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kengr
IANAL but as I understand it, you can't be forced to identify yourself even to law enforcement *now*. Seriously.

There are places they won't let you enter without "valid ID", and if you are driving a car or flying a plane or the like, they can demand to see your operating license.

But if you are just on the street, there's no requirement whatsoever to even *carry* ID. As cops get reminded of the hard way every few years.

Refusing to ID yourself carries with it some penalties, as annoying cops is never a good idea.

Fingerprints (and DNA and other things) are going to be a real problem though. If things get to the point where you are arrested, they *need* a way to unambiguously ID you if you get away or the like.

So they have to do *something*. And it cuts both ways. It may be the only way to prove that the guy they captured *isn't* [well known super].

Only things I can think of are either maintaining seperate supper and "civilian" fingerprint databases (and we all know how well *that* would work) or doing something like using foot prints for supers and fingerprints for norms.

As a *practical* matter, it's likely not that workable.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

November 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 18th, 2026 04:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios