stickmaker: (Default)
Stickmaker ([personal profile] stickmaker) wrote2009-06-24 11:58 pm
Entry tags:

Novel Excerpt

Excerpt from a hard SF novel in progress:

"All I've heard from you and the others about how this drive works are vague analogies," said Waide. "What's the math like?"

"Difficult," said Bailey, with a grimace. "To get a straight plot of a particular function, we had to use a base-e logarithmic scale on one leg and a base two-point-eight logarithmic scale on the other."

"That's... more than I want to take on," said Waide, looking stunned.

"It gets worse," said Bailey, with a slight tic in his left eye. "The field strength is measured in cubic Watts."
kengr: (Default)

[personal profile] kengr 2009-06-25 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
That's bizarre. And I can't see how "cubic Watts" makes any sense as a unit of field strength, the dimensions (units) don't match up.

[identity profile] filkermanque.livejournal.com 2009-06-25 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
I'm thinking that Bailey is perhaps tugging on Waide's leg.

[identity profile] stickmaker.livejournal.com 2009-06-25 01:24 pm (UTC)(link)


Drat. Caught. :-)

[identity profile] stickmaker.livejournal.com 2009-06-25 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)


It's hyperspatial. :-^)
kengr: (Default)

[personal profile] kengr 2009-06-25 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Sorry, won't wash. Dimensional anablysis is a very handy skill. Helps you make sure the units on both sides of an equation match up.

And "field strength" has to have units of "field" (force? Energy?) per area/volume/hypervolume.

Watts are kg m^2/s^2
"cubic watts" would be kg^3 m^6/s^6
You say it's hyperspatial? Ok, divide by m^4. Which leaves us with kg^3 m^2/s^6... peculiar sort of "field" doesn't *begin* to describe it.

(ie, if you are gonna make shit up, make sure it passes a first glance analysis :-)

Now, if you can figure out doubletalk that makes "sense" (Star Trek fails almost immediately) you can string along the mark a lot longer.